1992 Chrysler ES vs. 2000 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2000 Honda CR-V is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda CR-V (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler ES. (139 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda CR-V weights approximately 275 kg more than 1992 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler ES (232 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler ES | 2000 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Chrysler | Honda |
Model | ES | CR-V |
Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1745 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2620 mm |