1992 Chrysler ES vs. 2002 Volvo V70
To start off, 2002 Volvo V70 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler ES (139 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2002 Volvo V70. (138 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 2002 Volvo V70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo V70 weights approximately 255 kg more than 1992 Chrysler ES.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler ES (232 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Volvo V70. (220 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Volvo V70.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler ES | 2002 Volvo V70 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | ES | V70 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2760 mm |