1992 Chrysler ES vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 495 kg more than 1992 Chrysler ES.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Chrysler ES. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Chrysler ES | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | ES | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 139 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3010 mm |
