1992 Chrysler ES vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler ES (94 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (83 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chrysler ES weights approximately 200 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler ES (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (118 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler ES | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Chrysler | Volkswagen |
Model | ES | Polo |
Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1423 cc |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 77.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 945 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2410 mm |