1992 Chrysler ES vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (212 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler ES. (139 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler ES.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler ES (232 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler ES | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | ES | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1311 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2710 mm |