1992 Chrysler ES vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volkswagen Polo (148 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler ES. (139 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chrysler ES weights approximately 61 kg more than 2006 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler ES (232 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volkswagen Polo. (220 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Chrysler ES | 2006 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volkswagen |
| Model | ES | Polo |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1779 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 139 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 232 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1950 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1164 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2470 mm |
