1992 Chrysler ES vs. 2008 MG ZT
To start off, 2008 MG ZT is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 MG ZT (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler ES. (139 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 MG ZT weights approximately 335 kg more than 1992 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 MG ZT (246 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chrysler ES. (232 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2008 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler ES | 2008 MG ZT | |
Make | Chrysler | MG |
Model | ES | ZT |
Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2750 mm |