1992 Chrysler ES vs. 2008 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chrysler ES weights approximately 89 kg more than 2008 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler ES (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volkswagen Polo. (127 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Chrysler ES | 2008 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volkswagen |
| Model | ES | Polo |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1390 cc |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 166 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 75.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1056 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2470 mm |
