1992 Chrysler ES vs. 2009 Volvo S80
To start off, 2009 Volvo S80 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,953 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S80 (281 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler ES. (94 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler ES.
Because 2009 Volvo S80 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Chrysler ES. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo S80 (400 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler ES | 2009 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | ES | S80 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 93.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 18.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2840 mm |