1992 Chrysler ES vs. 2010 Acura TL
To start off, 2010 Acura TL is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura TL (280 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler ES. (139 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Acura TL weights approximately 463 kg more than 1992 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Acura TL (344 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chrysler ES. (232 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler ES | 2010 Acura TL | |
Make | Chrysler | Acura |
Model | ES | TL |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 344 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1688 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4966 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2776 mm |