1992 Chrysler ES vs. 2010 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2010 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler ES (139 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2010 Chrysler Sebring. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 2010 Chrysler Sebring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 625 kg more than 1992 Chrysler ES.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chrysler Sebring (311 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chrysler ES. (232 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Chrysler ES | 2010 Chrysler Sebring | |
| Make | Chrysler | Chrysler |
| Model | ES | Sebring |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 139 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 232 Nm | 311 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2770 mm |
