1992 Chrysler ES vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler ES (94 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pixo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Chrysler ES | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
| Model | ES | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2360 mm |
