1992 Chrysler ES vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler ES. (139 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler ES.
Because 2011 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chrysler ES. (232 Nm). This means 2011 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler ES | 2011 Holden UTE | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | ES | UTE |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 232 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |