1992 Chrysler ES vs. 2011 Mazda 3
To start off, 2011 Mazda 3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler ES. (139 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 3 weights approximately 75 kg more than 1992 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler ES (232 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda 3. (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler ES | 2011 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | ES | 3 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2639 mm |