1992 Chrysler ES vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 132 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler ES. (139 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler ES.
Because 2012 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chrysler ES. (232 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler ES | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | ES | XF |
Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 232 Nm | 600 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2908 mm |