1992 Chrysler ES vs. 2013 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2013 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler ES (139 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2013 Ford Transit Connect. (134 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford Transit Connect. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Transit Connect weights approximately 309 kg more than 1992 Chrysler ES.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler ES (232 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford Transit Connect. (174 Nm @ 4750 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford Transit Connect.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler ES | 2013 Ford Transit Connect | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | ES | Transit Connect |
Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1534 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4587 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2113 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2014 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2911 mm |