1992 Chrysler ES vs. 2013 Volvo X670
To start off, 2013 Volvo X670 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo X670 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo X670 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler ES. (139 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo X670 should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo X670 weights approximately 647 kg more than 1992 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo X670 (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chrysler ES. (232 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo X670 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler ES | 2013 Volvo X670 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | ES | X670 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1872 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2815 mm |