1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1946 Lancia Ardea 3
To start off, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Lancia |
Model | Le Baron | Ardea 3 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 903 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 28 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 29 L |