1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Le Baron | Phantom |
Year Released | 1992 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3690 mm |