1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1951 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1951 Triumph Mayflower is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Triumph Mayflower. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 1951 Triumph Mayflower | |
Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
Model | Le Baron | Mayflower |
Year Released | 1992 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 37 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 45 L |