1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1954 Plymouth Belvedere
To start off, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Plymouth Belvedere. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Plymouth Belvedere would be higher. At 3,960 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Plymouth Belvedere is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1954 Plymouth Belvedere is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Plymouth Belvedere. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 1954 Plymouth Belvedere | |
Make | Chrysler | Plymouth |
Model | Le Baron | Belvedere |
Year Released | 1992 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2930 mm |