1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1960 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher.
Because 1960 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 1960 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Le Baron | Falcon |
Year Released | 1992 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2710 mm |