1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1963 Seat 600

To start off, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron (152 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 769 kg more than 1963 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron (285 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler Le Baron will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.

Compare all specifications: