1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron (152 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 434 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron (285 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler Le Baron will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | Le Baron | Colt |
Year Released | 1992 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1344 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2360 mm |