1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | Le Baron | Celeste |
Year Released | 1992 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 45 L |