1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 136 kg more than 1992 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
Model | Le Baron | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1992 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1344 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2760 mm |