1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1981 Zastava 102

To start off, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron (152 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 570 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1992 Chrysler Le Baron has automatic transmission and 1981 Zastava 102 has manual transmission. 1981 Zastava 102 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Chrysler Le Baron will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: