1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1983 Donkervoort S7
To start off, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron (152 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Because 1983 Donkervoort S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Donkervoort S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron (285 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 1992 Chrysler Le Baron will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 1983 Donkervoort S7 | |
Make | Chrysler | Donkervoort |
Model | Le Baron | S7 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 285 Nm | 163 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1080 mm |