1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1995 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1995 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 1995 Mazda RX-7 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | Le Baron | RX-7 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 238 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2430 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 77 L |
