1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2001 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2001 Ford Econoline is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 2001 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Le Baron | Econoline |
Year Released | 1992 | 2001 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 4194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3510 mm |