1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Le Baron | Ranger |
Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3010 mm |