1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2003 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2003 Holden Rodeo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Holden Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 2003 Holden Rodeo | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Le Baron | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 3494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3060 mm |