1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2003 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2003 Toyota Tundra is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 2003 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Le Baron | Tundra |
Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3270 mm |