1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2004 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2004 Ford Expedition is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Ford Expedition is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Expedition. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 2004 Ford Expedition | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Le Baron | Expedition |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 260 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 106 L |