1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2007 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2007 Ford Ranger is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron (152 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2007 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford Ranger.

Because 2007 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron (285 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler Le Baron will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford Ranger. 1992 Chrysler Le Baron has automatic transmission and 2007 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2007 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Chrysler Le Baron will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Chrysler Le Baron 2007 Ford Ranger
Make Chrysler Ford
Model Le Baron Ranger
Year Released 1992 2007
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2501 cc 2399 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 152 HP 143 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 285 Nm 209 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 3750 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 7.8:1 9.7:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 3 seats
Vehicle Length 4700 mm 4820 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1770 mm
Wheelbase Size 2560 mm 2840 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]