1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. (152 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler Le Baron.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron (285 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1992 Chrysler Le Baron will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | Le Baron | Epica |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2700 mm |
