1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2009 Volvo V50
To start off, 2009 Volvo V50 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 2009 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Le Baron | V50 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 227 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 62 L |