1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2010 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Charger is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 2010 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | Le Baron | Charger |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 250 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3048 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 68 L |