1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. (152 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2010 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. (285 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chrysler Le Baron.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | Le Baron | XF |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 285 Nm | 450 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2908 mm |