1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Le Baron | XC90 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 4400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 311 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 80 L |