1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2012 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2012 Nissan Armada is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Nissan Armada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Nissan Armada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 2012 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
| Model | Le Baron | Armada |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 5600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 317 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5276 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2014 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1961 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3129 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 106 L |
