1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2013 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2013 Nissan Armada is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 2013 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Le Baron | Armada |
Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 5600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 313 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5276 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2014 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1981 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 105 L |