1992 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Le Baron | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Chrysler | Smart |
Model | Le Baron | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 33 L |