1992 Chrysler TC vs. 1962 Mini MK I
To start off, 1992 Chrysler TC is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mini MK I would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler TC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler TC (175 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1962 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler TC should accelerate faster than 1962 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chrysler TC weights approximately 861 kg more than 1962 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler TC (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mini MK I. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler TC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler TC | 1962 Mini MK I | |
Make | Chrysler | Mini |
Model | TC | MK I |
Year Released | 1992 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 61 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2040 mm |