1992 Chrysler TC vs. 1976 Ford Cortina
To start off, 1992 Chrysler TC is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler TC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler TC (175 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1976 Ford Cortina. (73 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler TC should accelerate faster than 1976 Ford Cortina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chrysler TC weights approximately 362 kg more than 1976 Ford Cortina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler TC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler TC (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Ford Cortina. (117 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler TC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler TC | 1976 Ford Cortina | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | TC | Cortina |
Year Released | 1992 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1593 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 117 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1114 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2590 mm |