1992 Chrysler TC vs. 1989 Ford Granada
To start off, 1992 Chrysler TC is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Granada would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler TC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler TC (175 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1989 Ford Granada. (125 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler TC should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Granada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chrysler TC weights approximately 211 kg more than 1989 Ford Granada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Ford Granada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Ford Granada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler TC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler TC (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Ford Granada. (174 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler TC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Ford Granada.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler TC | 1989 Ford Granada | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | TC | Granada |
Year Released | 1992 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 125 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2770 mm |