1992 Chrysler TC vs. 1996 Mazda Sentia
To start off, 1996 Mazda Sentia is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 2,952 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Sentia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Sentia weights approximately 124 kg more than 1992 Chrysler TC.
Because 1996 Mazda Sentia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mazda Sentia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler TC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler TC | 1996 Mazda Sentia | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | TC | Sentia |
Year Released | 1992 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2952 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 77.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2860 mm |