1992 Chrysler TC vs. 1999 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1999 Mazda Midge is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler TC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler TC (175 HP) has 108 more horse power than 1999 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler TC should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chrysler TC weights approximately 510 kg more than 1999 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler TC (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler TC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler TC | 1999 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | TC | Midge |
Year Released | 1992 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1400 mm |