1992 Chrysler TC vs. 2002 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 3,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler TC. (175 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler TC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chrysler TC weights approximately 91 kg more than 2002 Chrysler Crossfire.
Because 2002 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler TC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Crossfire (340 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chrysler TC. (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2002 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chrysler TC.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Chrysler TC | 2002 Chrysler Crossfire | |
| Make | Chrysler | Chrysler |
| Model | TC | Crossfire |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 3195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1385 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2410 mm |
