1992 Chrysler TC vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler TC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler TC (175 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler TC should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chrysler TC weights approximately 131 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler TC (271 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 1992 Chrysler TC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Chrysler TC | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | TC | 6 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2610 mm |
